> The goal of stack exchange is to create a repository of question answer pairs of knowledge. The problem here is that generational AI isn't able to create these new pairs.
I'm not so sure about that. I think we are quite close to an AI being able to put two and two together to create something marginally new. Maybe not an LLM by itself, but with some high-level iterative/recursive process like this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10601.pdf.
What I'm saying is that no-AI policy maybe made sense in late 2022, but will not necessarily hold in late 2023.
I'm not so sure about that. I think we are quite close to an AI being able to put two and two together to create something marginally new. Maybe not an LLM by itself, but with some high-level iterative/recursive process like this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10601.pdf.
What I'm saying is that no-AI policy maybe made sense in late 2022, but will not necessarily hold in late 2023.