>Well known universities have more funds available and will be able to attract the best teachers away from the lesser universities.
if we see that the work 20 years ago at a lesser known university was of the same quality as the work at a well known one, then I don't really get your argument about the money?
>Researchers may be willing to cite work from well known universities over similar work done at lesser universities.
which would really be confirming the argument that similar levels of quality get treated differently given their source.
>Well known universities have more funds available and will be able to attract the best teachers away from the lesser universities.
if we see that the work 20 years ago at a lesser known university was of the same quality as the work at a well known one, then I don't really get your argument about the money?
>Researchers may be willing to cite work from well known universities over similar work done at lesser universities.
which would really be confirming the argument that similar levels of quality get treated differently given their source.