Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's one thing if they don't care about the abuse, but they should be honest (including with themselves) on that. It's another to reassign the abuse to people they have different reasons to dislike.



That's a fair take.

A lot of things I love were made my people that I find personally despicable. If I have to weight how much I like the creators and companies behind everything I consume, that will be recipe for a very tiresome and frustrating life.

This is not to give a pass to Blizzard. The scandals there are pretty bad. But it's up to the employees (and perhaps to the judicial system) to do something about it.


Some of the employees were the perpetrators, some were the victims, and some decided putting food on the table was more important than making the moral stand.

Management will do as much about this as the market incentivizes them to.

Ultimately the ability to produce incentives is in the hands of consumers most directly, and through the judicial system, (so, pretty indirectly) voters.

I dunno. I like classic rock and movies. So I probably consume some art created by assholes. But it isn’t something I’m proud of.


I buy things produced by companies know to make use of slave labor and pollute the environment. I enjoy art made by people that honestly deserve to be punched in the face everyday.

It's not about being proud or ashamed about anything there. If the powers that be refuse to punish people and corporations that deserve to be punished, I think it's ultimately unfair to offload that responsibility onto consumers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: