Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

His statements on open sourcing in this interview/write-up is somewhat in conflict with his recent statement made last week in Munich https://youtu.be/uaQZIK9gvNo?t=1170, where he explicitly said the Frontier of GPT won't be open sourced due to what they perceive as safety reasons, https://youtu.be/uaQZIK9gvNo?t=1170 (19:30 - 22:00).



He was talking about open sourcing GPT-3. That is not the frontier.

The frontier is the multimodal versions of GPT-4 which he just said wasn't even going to public release until next year. Or whatever they are on now which they are carefully not calling GPT-5.


I don't see the conflict. They see current models as mostly harmless, but what comes next is dangerous.

It sounds a little too much sci-fi for me, but I guess he knows better.


plus this conveniently pairs with "we don't need to regulate current models, but future models... oh boy do those need to be regulated!"


it's legal to make contradictory statements that's one of the job of a ceo and it's why they aren't usually overly literal types you know the kind i'm talking about




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: