Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Not to be pedantic but wouldn't stacking transistors have no effect on density per square inch? Since it would only increase density per cubic inch.



We include multi-story buildings when we calculate population density, why not include multi-story chips?


Stacking transistors increases density per square inch if it can be done on a single wafer of silicon, because its "per square inch of fab wafer silicon"


I view it as if you cut 1 square inch of a motherboard. That the every 2 years you’d expect to see roughly double the number of transistors in that cut out piece.

Scaling vertically would “technically” still meet the above.


I don’t think that’s what they mean by per square inch. They mean in a plane, not a volume. If you add a third dimension the law stays the same, because a volume is two planes and the density law applies to each independently. That’s why node sizes are a single value not a two dimensional value. A 3nm node is 3nm feature sizes, regardless of dimensionality.


The quote given on Wikipedia is:

> The complexity for minimum component costs has increased at a rate of roughly a factor of two per year. Certainly over the short term this rate can be expected to continue, if not to increase. Over the longer term, the rate of increase is a bit more uncertain, although there is no reason to believe it will not remain nearly constant for at least 10 years.

If he was talking about the area of a single transistor, there would be more concise ways to put it.


Even a 1000ft thick motherboard?


That'll show Moore


More’s law: if there is more of it, it does more!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: