In your view, what would it take to get the not-in-good-standing issue resolved?
What do you get out of shitposting Wasmer when they announce an initiative they are excited about? (I'm mostly trying to understand your psychology, not whether or if you have some kind of competing financial interest)
> In your view, what would it take to get the not-in-good-standing issue resolved?
probably the most effective way would be for the organization to release a statement abdicating their previous controversial positions, and for the CEO to resign
Yeah, I read all that. I still don't understand why/how the lawyers went ahead with the trademark process before the engagement letter was signed.
Like, I want to believe you, it just seems weird of lawyers to do the thing without the i's dotted and t's crossed. I can see software devs totally barging ahead, but lawyers, less so.
until that is resolved, their products should probably not be viewed in good faith