The point is a16z is wholly unqualified to offer commentary on AI. The authors are qualified. But I’m immediately sceptical given their choice of affiliation.

Right, I am making a comment about the overall tenor of the website, which requires looking at multiple threads.

You're saying "No, they just really hate a16z" and I'm saying huh, it is interesting that all of the threads on new technology, whether it is LLMs or crypto or whatever, tend to have people who "really hate [xyz]".

Honestly, it speaks to the magnitude of the LLM breakthrough that HN is at least mixed on that topic.

Fwiw I'm a huge fan of LLMs and not a fan at all of a16z for the reasons I stated. I think you're reading too much into this thread.

If you actually joined the website 13 days ago though, I'm not sure if you are really in a position to evaluate the shift in culture over years timespan?

Lot of talking down to new users coming from a 3 year old account on a website that's been up for 15+ years.

This site would be better if users like you read and followed their own advice.

I'm not talking down, in fact I think it is likely they have either been lurking for much longer than they've had an account or this is not their first account. That's the case for me, for instance.

There's no higher "status" or anything to be gained on how long you spend on this silly site, I just think it is relevant to the specific conversation.

Ah, so the person with multiple accounts knows that account age is irrelevant, but still chooses to pick on "new" users anyway.

Why is account age relevant to the conversation when you have already demonstrated it's not accurate?

That's the point lol. Hacker news guidelines clearly state... sigh whatever