Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Chemistry is a bit late to the game

This is not true. In the 80s? 90s? E.J. Corey spearheaded an attempt to create a database of all chemical reactions and tried to get programmers to design expert systems to create intelligent chemistry planners. If anything, they were too early to the game.




I suspect chemistry was playing about with automatic (retro)synthesis way earlier than you think: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/bk-1977-0061.ch001. I think it was work started in the 60's, and big names worked on it.


Heh that was the exact paper I was talking about, guess I got the decade wrong


Wasn’t the human genome mapped recently?

That’s some of the most relevant (to us) chemistry

In fact biochemistry is a data science AND also programming. It’s not von neumann architecture, but it’s far more complex!


Eh, the dimensionality and coupled-ness of the genome makes it a very different big data problem than basically every other big data problem.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: