Yup, that's the entire point of the paper (and it's really clearly written and approachable by non-experts!)
Parent was equating predatory pricing (in general) with loss-leaders, which have nothing to do with the subject of this paper.
Yup, that's the entire point of the paper (and it's really clearly written and approachable by non-experts!)
Parent was equating predatory pricing (in general) with loss-leaders, which have nothing to do with the subject of this paper.