> But then, Copilot will be able to analyze the code and violates the license terms, which isn’t.
I'm not sure about this. In most cases the result would be similar to a human reading a lot of opensource and later when writing use patterns that they'd learned. It's only in the edge cases where there's clear 'plagiarism' on a niche prompt that it would be problematic. An more direct solution isn't to take everything off GitHub, but rather to not allow Copilot to do near-literal copy/paste.
If we moved opensource to BitBucket, there's no protection that it wouldn't do the same as Copilot. Attack the problem directly.
A way to think of this banner is that of signing a publicly visible petition to make Copilot behave as humans abiding to licenses do.
I'm not sure about this. In most cases the result would be similar to a human reading a lot of opensource and later when writing use patterns that they'd learned. It's only in the edge cases where there's clear 'plagiarism' on a niche prompt that it would be problematic. An more direct solution isn't to take everything off GitHub, but rather to not allow Copilot to do near-literal copy/paste.
If we moved opensource to BitBucket, there's no protection that it wouldn't do the same as Copilot. Attack the problem directly.
A way to think of this banner is that of signing a publicly visible petition to make Copilot behave as humans abiding to licenses do.