But you don't need to know to test yourself, and empirically, the author seems right, at least for image generation. The most specific your Lisa is, the less noisy images you get.
My intuition is the same as the author, I feel like we are at a limit (how much data can we really feed the models?), and most llm (except gpt4 apparently) are often too wrong to be useful (unless you need intern-level work). I think the next step is deepening the LLMs and specialize them (at least for code generation).
My intuition is the same as the author, I feel like we are at a limit (how much data can we really feed the models?), and most llm (except gpt4 apparently) are often too wrong to be useful (unless you need intern-level work). I think the next step is deepening the LLMs and specialize them (at least for code generation).