Does it need one? For doing what exactly? And why is a hereditary position better for this than one elected by democratic means?
> Having a heredity apolitical monarch works really well in the context of a commonwealth of nation.
Why?
> , but I do think there is value in having an heredity head of state with very limited powers.
Such as? Because tons of countries in the world don't spend huge sums of money on such an institution, and don't seem to miss out on anything.
Does it need one? For doing what exactly? And why is a hereditary position better for this than one elected by democratic means?
> Having a heredity apolitical monarch works really well in the context of a commonwealth of nation.
Why?
> , but I do think there is value in having an heredity head of state with very limited powers.
Such as? Because tons of countries in the world don't spend huge sums of money on such an institution, and don't seem to miss out on anything.