Cash is terribly inconvenient to the powers that be. In addition to the irritating ability for me to transfer value to other people or companies without an overt trace, it puts a reasonable lower bound on the effective interest rate - you can't go much below 0% without people just paying to hold cash. It's not relevant right now, but a few years back, the noises about how awesome negative interest rates would be to properly stimulate demand were rather loud. There are a few books written as cover fire for this concept as well. If you put $1000 in your bank account today and will have $995 next year, may as well spend it to stimulate the consumer economy instead of "hoarding" it, right?
Maybe that's how cash will go out - not with a ban, but a whimper. Once a cheeseburger hits $100, people will probably collectively decide that dealing with bands of cash for small purchases is more trouble than it's worth.
I know plenty of people, some I'm related to, who are full in on what amounts to "Well, they know everything anyway, why shouldn't I use the most convenient payment option?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_denominations_of_United_...
Cash is terribly inconvenient to the powers that be. In addition to the irritating ability for me to transfer value to other people or companies without an overt trace, it puts a reasonable lower bound on the effective interest rate - you can't go much below 0% without people just paying to hold cash. It's not relevant right now, but a few years back, the noises about how awesome negative interest rates would be to properly stimulate demand were rather loud. There are a few books written as cover fire for this concept as well. If you put $1000 in your bank account today and will have $995 next year, may as well spend it to stimulate the consumer economy instead of "hoarding" it, right?