Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From a PR perspective, I'm surprised that they don't have a procedure where they announce that they're considering to terminate, then announce that they'll blow it up, before actually doing it, if time allows.

I think there is a significant difference in public perception between "it blew up during the test" and "the test wasn't going to go anywhere good so they blew it up".



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: