What a beautiful thing if you think about it. You own your content and use Twitter, etc as a communication layer in your protocol. Restricted API access makes this difficult but what an evolution.
It's great but for the interaction problem. And mixed contexts.
The automated twitter accounts feel like a fire and forget. And you probably want to eavesdrop the conversation.
This could be AI territory, who's mentioning this? Web mention is a flawed system, but reaches for the right target.
I see people drifting back to Twitter from Mastodon as they crave previous circle interaction. They don't like missing conversation, and comment systems per blog can be sucky.
I have mixed feelings about "the conversation" and social networks. Frequently there is no conversation.
There is the perspective that social networks are about connecting people, having deliberations, the town square. And then there is the influencer, marketing communication, discoverability, sales funnel, SEO, push perspective.
The syndication perspective in a way frames social networks mostly as the latter. I think this is a pragmatic, realistic view of what social networks have (mostly become), but it is sad. Not sure if AI (as in summarize, aggregate, "sentiment analytics") has much to offer here that is actually meaningful.
Very true. How many times someone asks for recommendations and then does follows up with the recommendation. It is used, at least on twitter, as away to get engagement without any intention of connection.
> And then there is the influencer, marketing communication, discoverability, sales funnel, SEO, push perspective.
This is the stuff you don't need for the conversation. Maybe once more the IndieWeb and the ActivityPub-based Fediverse should try to meet each other. On the Fediverse conversations and town squares are what you get (to the frustration of some Twitter migrants, I should add).
