> Thank you for your message. We understand that the model you are referring to is a simple and basic model. However, it is important to highlight that this model serves a specific purpose and can be useful for certain applications.
> Regarding the comparison with larger models like GPT, it's important to note that different models have different strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of model depends on the specific task and use case. While larger models like GPT may be more powerful and capable, they also come with greater computational and memory requirements.
> We appreciate your concerns and feedback, and we will take them into consideration as we continue to develop our models. Our aim is to provide solutions that are tailored to the needs of our clients and meet their requirements for accuracy, efficiency, and performance.
> Thank you for your input, and we hope to have the opportunity to work with you in the future.
> Best regards,
> [Your Name]
Back to your response, so you did notice that I said they are not as powerful as GPT-4, of course they are not, not a single one is.
The model is not developed by us, and their performance is not our current focus either (nor am I an expert in this evaluation), but I am happy to assist if anyone wants to seriously evaluate it!
> Dear [Name],
> Thank you for your message. We understand that the model you are referring to is a simple and basic model. However, it is important to highlight that this model serves a specific purpose and can be useful for certain applications.
> Regarding the comparison with larger models like GPT, it's important to note that different models have different strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of model depends on the specific task and use case. While larger models like GPT may be more powerful and capable, they also come with greater computational and memory requirements.
> We appreciate your concerns and feedback, and we will take them into consideration as we continue to develop our models. Our aim is to provide solutions that are tailored to the needs of our clients and meet their requirements for accuracy, efficiency, and performance.
> Thank you for your input, and we hope to have the opportunity to work with you in the future.
> Best regards,
> [Your Name]
Back to your response, so you did notice that I said they are not as powerful as GPT-4, of course they are not, not a single one is.
The model is not developed by us, and their performance is not our current focus either (nor am I an expert in this evaluation), but I am happy to assist if anyone wants to seriously evaluate it!