Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Addiction is a mental and physical health issue. Why on earth are the police involved in the first place? That's not what they're for.

But a lot of what you're describing is literally the Portuguese model, which you can find out if you read the article. They can require you go to rehab depending on if it's your first time or if you're addicted. It's just not a criminal matter, it's a public health matter. Which means you have less stigma, you avoid prison, a record - and you are more likely to ask for help.

We know for a fact prison is a place you can get drugs, and going there leaves you more likely to be addicted, not less, because you look to those same drugs as an escape from your prison situation.




> Addiction is a mental and physical health issue. Why on earth are the police involved in the first place? That's not what they're for.

The police is going to be the first one to interact with addicts because they should be working on dismantling the entire drug network and working on catching dealers, through catching addicts/buyers.


> The police is going to be the first one to interact with addicts because they should be working on dismantling the entire drug network and working on catching dealers, through catching addicts/buyers.

Isn’t that what we’ve been doing for the last 50 years? How did that work out?


> 5he police is going to be the first one to interact with addicts because they should be working on dismantling the entire drug network and working on catching dealers.

Dealers aren't users or addicts. Different people. The police would not be the first to respond to them in 99% of cases.

And you can dismantle the network by making it uncompetitive. Let the state sell drugs, who cares? Then the narcos die off and the network dismantles itself.


The state selling drugs means actively endorsing them.


Nah, the state already taxes drugs. Same thing. It also sells alcohol while taxing the ever loving crap out of it. Nobody's going to say the state is endorsing cigarettes, alcohol and gambling. They're minimizing harm through controlled, regulated and taxed distribution.

The thing is we've provided all sorts of ways for you to achieve your goal of not seeing zombies on the street without the cruelty. And yet you continue to try and find ways to invent problems. It seems like the cruelty of your suggestion may be the point?


You said it your self "without cruelty"

That's the entire problem, that's why most police forces can't enforce shit against drug dealers and addicts.

There is a balance, and currently its at the wrong side.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: