Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because they claim the not-smart versions aren't worth it. They suggest alternative solutions, some of which commenters here have already echoed. Why the cynicism?


Then provide the reader with the name of the very best crappy one and what features it lacks. That at very least answer's the question that was posed. The writer mention bluetooth connectivity as something they want tv's to have. I consider that feature stupid and wouldnt consider that a negative.


The "aren't worth it" argument is entirely arbitrary and not backed up by a shred of evidence. Why defend bad journalism?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: