> Someone needs to start a competing Internet Archive, which only archives, you know, THE INTERNET
And a faster, more reliable (in terms of percentage of 5XX responses) one would be nice. Right now Wayback Machine performance leaves a lot to be desired. I end up using archive.is whenever possible.
Yes, I donate to Internet Archive, don’t chastise me.
I'm surprised there isn't a paid alternative to Wayback Machine. I'd pay for fewer 5xx errors (which are often rate limiting, I.E. "You clicked more than 10 times in 10 minutes, that's WAY TOO FAST bro")
And a faster, more reliable (in terms of percentage of 5XX responses) one would be nice. Right now Wayback Machine performance leaves a lot to be desired. I end up using archive.is whenever possible.
Yes, I donate to Internet Archive, don’t chastise me.