I think it's impossible to write anything with nuance on the Internet, as it is always taken out of context and used as a gross caricature of the original point, as you have done.

I'm quite familiar with pg's essay, and the idea that he's arguing that "Rules, laws , morality are for other people" is laughable. Sure, it's fair to argue against his point, but one of the main thing he highlights in his essay is clearly knowing the difference between rules and laws that are morally important, versus ones that came about through regulatory capture or "tradition".

Most societies have at least some tradition of celebrating "good trouble".