Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I've heard professors preface generalisation or metaphors with, "What I'm about to say isn't exactly true but it should be helpful in apprehending the central concept."

Basically to include extensive caveats and exceptions in the first explanation is to risk overwhelming the novice.

I think that's what this is. Sort of just moving from a high level understanding to a lower level one. Is there more to it?




Yeah, those concepts agree with each other, so there's still some value to the simplification once you know the complex explanation.

This is more of a sabotage mission, where the examples are meant to convince of their own inadequacy (and the inadequacy of rigid logical thought).




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: