I've heard professors preface generalisation or metaphors with, "What I'm about to say isn't exactly true but it should be helpful in apprehending the central concept."
Basically to include extensive caveats and exceptions in the first explanation is to risk overwhelming the novice.
I think that's what this is. Sort of just moving from a high level understanding to a lower level one. Is there more to it?
Basically to include extensive caveats and exceptions in the first explanation is to risk overwhelming the novice.
I think that's what this is. Sort of just moving from a high level understanding to a lower level one. Is there more to it?