Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It seems that they have "soft forked" act as well. I worry that they will spend more time maintaining all their forks than doing any original development...



Gitea soft forked act as well, from https://gitea.com/gitea/act:

"This is a custom fork of nektos/act, for the purpose of serving act_runner.

It cannot be used as command line tool anymore, but only as a library.

It's a soft fork, which means that it will tracking the latest release of nektos/act."


I see, removed that from my comment then, sorry. I looked at their go.mod and assumed.

Now I worry even more about everyone maintaining forks of everything rather than doing original development.

I wonder what differences there are between Gitea's and Forgejo's forks, and also why they couldn't work with upstream.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: