What it says though, is that bailing it out is off the table.
Which has an effect on the investors outcome, hence help depositor better, or at lower cost.
It's an investors, depositors, and tax payers dilema.
The brightest and only fair outcome would be that a private funds/bank aquires SVB. That way everyone is made whole at the expense of nobody. A very unlikely scenario given nobody would touch a beyond help entity with, potentially, liabilities turning out greater than the overall assets left. Intengible assets may save the day, still a bit of hope there.
Which has an effect on the investors outcome, hence help depositor better, or at lower cost.
It's an investors, depositors, and tax payers dilema.
The brightest and only fair outcome would be that a private funds/bank aquires SVB. That way everyone is made whole at the expense of nobody. A very unlikely scenario given nobody would touch a beyond help entity with, potentially, liabilities turning out greater than the overall assets left. Intengible assets may save the day, still a bit of hope there.