Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> ... never had a breakout.

Would "never detected a breakout" be better wording? :)




> We had sophisticated network and system anomaly detection, high priced pentesters

I assume GP wrote that in order to say that they have a high confidence that they never actually had a breakout.

You are technically correct. But your logic applies to everything. Is the isolation provided by VMs good enough? Is airgapping enough to prevent breakout?

There are many things that factor in when you decide what's reasonable. Some are first principle arguments (containers use the same kernel as the host, the kernel has a large surface area, ...). Others are statistical arguments: there have been past breakouts with this stack, it's thus reasonable to expect more in the future, ...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: