You can assure me with the might of 1000 exploding suns, but it STILL means nothing.
I'm not insinuating that those unknown entities that only you know of are using the tool wrong. I'm literally claiming that they are because being "not really small company" says absolutely nothing about the way their engineers do their job.
> If I see the same patterns everywhere
"everywhere" is, again, something that exists in your head only and no one else knows what "everywhere" is. Where is everywhere? Who exactly are the people who are running into these unknown troubles? Are they knowledgeable engineers? Do they understand underlying problem that the tool solves? I'd say that you are consuming resources which gather people who run into problems due to their lack of knowledge, such as stackoverflow.com so yes, the pattern you'll see is problems.
> I will blame the tool, absolutely
Because the tool needs to bridge the gap between what people understand and what they want to achieve, there's literally no responsibility on the human in this story. Great thinking, let's see how that plays out :)
> If we use them wrong, it is the tool that must change, not us.
If you want to achieve the goal, the easiest thing to change is you and not the world around you. But by all means, you do you, the only currency you'll effectively pay with is your invaluable and irreplaceable time.
> Must I only comment on the tool itself without anything in its periphery?
I didn't tell you what you *must*, I asked why you didn't. You still have the option to do so, but that would require that you actually invest time into checking out Konsta UI - which you didn't, right? Is my assumption correct? You just didn't do it but you commented on what you disliked. I think that's all there is to it.
I asked for numbers, which you don't have. Had you read what's written, you'd see it. That would convince anyone, and does not require me to trust a random stranger with ego issues.
Self-proclaimed professional like you should not skim text. You miss the point that way.
> You can assure me with the might of 1000 exploding suns, but it STILL means nothing
> I'd say that you are consuming resources which gather people who run into problems due to their lack of knowledge, such as stackoverflow.com so yes, the pattern you'll see is problems.
Whatever numbers I give you will be unconvincing to you, is what I meant. So why should I try to convince you, when you yourself also pull No True Scotsman if I tell you I worked with good engineers who knew what they were doing? You will just say I am "consuming the wrong resources." Anything I say will not convince you.
Therefore there is nothing I could say to convince you further.
I'm not insinuating that those unknown entities that only you know of are using the tool wrong. I'm literally claiming that they are because being "not really small company" says absolutely nothing about the way their engineers do their job.
> If I see the same patterns everywhere
"everywhere" is, again, something that exists in your head only and no one else knows what "everywhere" is. Where is everywhere? Who exactly are the people who are running into these unknown troubles? Are they knowledgeable engineers? Do they understand underlying problem that the tool solves? I'd say that you are consuming resources which gather people who run into problems due to their lack of knowledge, such as stackoverflow.com so yes, the pattern you'll see is problems.
> I will blame the tool, absolutely
Because the tool needs to bridge the gap between what people understand and what they want to achieve, there's literally no responsibility on the human in this story. Great thinking, let's see how that plays out :)
> If we use them wrong, it is the tool that must change, not us.
If you want to achieve the goal, the easiest thing to change is you and not the world around you. But by all means, you do you, the only currency you'll effectively pay with is your invaluable and irreplaceable time.
> Must I only comment on the tool itself without anything in its periphery?
I didn't tell you what you *must*, I asked why you didn't. You still have the option to do so, but that would require that you actually invest time into checking out Konsta UI - which you didn't, right? Is my assumption correct? You just didn't do it but you commented on what you disliked. I think that's all there is to it.