You didn't address the argument. You latched onto an imperfect analogy (and all analogues are imperfect). That tells me everything I need to know: you got no argument. You'll still seek to discredit the other side any way you can though, apparently.
I made arguments in this thread. You ignoring them and insisting on shifting the topic is disingenuous line of arguing.
Spelling it out for you: some safety is better than none. That was the topic. And that people call "cult" whatever they don't like in a very vain attempt to discredit it.
This is why Rust is toxic. This right here. It's unfortunate that an entire language is poisoned by too much dishonest advocacy but here we are. Nobody likes this disingenuous astroturf.
You don't like how I talk -- it's your right. But to ascribe some properties on an entire language and ecosystem, now that is a disingenuous astroturf.
