Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The clones tend to be reimplemented from scratch.

It turns out a team of 10 in a few months can reimplement a small microcontroller from just the public documentation of a competitor. By being 100% compatible, customers can move across without any engineering work, and you can reuse the same toolchain.

I doubt either the manufacturer or their customers will have any legal issues.

On the other hand, you probably will have issues when the original and the clone differ slightly or have different bugs.



TFA says this one isn't STM32 clone though. Just the peripherals are similar.

Not sure about ARM license.


> Not sure about ARM license.

I wouldn't be surprised if that's legit. The Cortex-M0/M0+ core is fairly inexpensive to license and use. It's effectively a loss-leader for ARM.


Why would it be a loss leader?

Surely it's because 0.1c X a bajillion chips is still a lot.


Because there are a lot of other tiny microcontroller ISA's, and there isn't much value in using one over another.

If they charged much at all, then people would just use another.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: