Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What slippery slope exactly?



One is a cultural matter: A design idea that no longer actively attempts to produce a language with few orthogonal features that work well together. The second is a side-effect: the more features you have in a language, the more complex new features will be to accomodate all the past cases.


I suppose once you have accepted ad-hoc features, you don't have a strong argument against adding more of them.


Not becoming c++ is a strong argument




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: