Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But can't Chaitin's constant be described using a finite set of symbols, those symbols being in the set [achinost'] (at least, in English)?



OK, original poster doesn't speak about computable numbers: "consider the set of numbers that cannot be described using any finite collection of symbols"

But I have a hard time accepting numbers, which can only be described in natural language.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: