I don't think 'pulling up the ladders behind you' is an issue here at all. This isn't artists or writers pulling up the ladders here .
The ML experts who are making these systems aren't professional writers or professional artists. Industry is always convinced by automation and lower costs, and boards who make these decisions are senior professional management not creatives. Neither group ever cared about the ladder behind them in other industries or their own companies.
The question is one of what we want to accept as societal norms, or push for legislation of regulation. Personally I think the idea of banning such systems won't work, but all writing done by ChatGPT or other 'creative' work done by other ML models should be regulated such that it must be marked with a discloser that it is the product of a 'creative' machine learning model. Human authorship is an important distinction that needs to be clearly distinguished.
The ML experts who are making these systems aren't professional writers or professional artists. Industry is always convinced by automation and lower costs, and boards who make these decisions are senior professional management not creatives. Neither group ever cared about the ladder behind them in other industries or their own companies.
The question is one of what we want to accept as societal norms, or push for legislation of regulation. Personally I think the idea of banning such systems won't work, but all writing done by ChatGPT or other 'creative' work done by other ML models should be regulated such that it must be marked with a discloser that it is the product of a 'creative' machine learning model. Human authorship is an important distinction that needs to be clearly distinguished.