I tend to agree in spirit, but I worry there's a real risk of a lemon market[1] situation.
If, for whatever reason, consumers of content are not immediately attuned to the difference between vacuous GPT-nonsense and something that would bring them value if they just thought hard enough, it might lead to an overall reduction of returns to thoughtful, high-quality content, even if that content is only momentarily over the head of the reader, but wouldn't be in the long run.
This obviously to the detriment of both the consumers and producers of content.
If, for whatever reason, consumers of content are not immediately attuned to the difference between vacuous GPT-nonsense and something that would bring them value if they just thought hard enough, it might lead to an overall reduction of returns to thoughtful, high-quality content, even if that content is only momentarily over the head of the reader, but wouldn't be in the long run.
This obviously to the detriment of both the consumers and producers of content.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons