Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

didn't meta need to switch to mercurial and a custom extension for it because they were not able to make it work with git?



IIRC originally neither mercurial nor git would scale enough, but mercurial was much more willing to accept scalability-related patches, so long as they didn’t harm the more common small-scale use-cases. After a couple of years of submitting patches for moderate improvements, meta wanted to make some more controversial large-scale changes like dropping support for sequential commit numbers, and ended up hard-forking and breaking compatibility to do that. That incompatible-but-better-performing fork then stayed internal for a while, before recently being released as Sapling.

As a bonus, part of the rewrite of the internal storage engine involved creating a storage engine abstraction layer, which in turn made it easy to add Git as a backend :D




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: