This guy's extensive, numerous analyses of plane crashes are downright excellent and deeply detailed like few other texts about the subject that I've ever found online. If he makes mistakes here and there, or attributes blame somewhat incorrectly on occasion, it's a minor issue considering the sheer scope of what he's written.
Many of the criticisms in the comments below that I've seen are deeply uncharitable in a way that's so typical of this site, where man y people post dense opinions with all kinds of viewpoints that mis-attribute blame and say mistaken things for all sorts of reasons on numerous subjects.
How ridiculously typical of the self-congratulatory audience on HN. Have none of you ever written code that has a flaw or two?
Many of the criticisms in the comments below that I've seen are deeply uncharitable in a way that's so typical of this site, where man y people post dense opinions with all kinds of viewpoints that mis-attribute blame and say mistaken things for all sorts of reasons on numerous subjects.
How ridiculously typical of the self-congratulatory audience on HN. Have none of you ever written code that has a flaw or two?