Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This list amounts to a social credit system that some cities in China have implemented. I always thought that was something we’d like to avoid in the US. The fact that it’s privatized in the US and a government list in China makes no difference: is it any different to be blocked from taking a bullet train in China than to be blocked from flying in the U.S.?

I have several concrete problems with these lists.

1. Secrecy. I should have a right to know if I’m on the black list.

2. Due process. There is no process to being put on the black list. Partially because you don’t know it’s happening, there’s no way to contest it.

3. Permanency. The punishment should fit the crime. If you do something at 18 that shouldn’t be a lifetime punishment. However being on a secret list of names and faces distributed between companies is a lifetime punishment.

> If the list is too inaccurate, it stops doing its job and becomes a net-no-help to the venue using it.

This is an extremely optimistic take. In reality, what is the threshold of false positives where the list stops being useful? One percent? Five percent? Hell, even if the list is 10% wrong you’re still denying people who should be denied 90% of the time. And there will always be a stigma against people who are on such lists. “You must’ve done something to get on that list.”



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: