Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Stupid question, but doesn't rust have it's own, highly praised compiler? I'm just genuinely curious - would using gcc be better under any practical circumstance? Do they both generate low level code with/for LLVM?


Rust-GCC has an FAQ section that lists the benefits of having a GCC frontend:

https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Ques...

I'm in no way a compiler expert, but from what I understood, they specifically want to avoid mixing GCC and LLVM: https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Ques...


You can also use rustc as a frontend to GCC through rustc_codegen_gcc.

https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc


Actually, if they can provide a stable release with the most important nightly features I might pick this over rustc.

The rust team don't seem to understand anything about production software, quality assurance and maintenance. Hopefully competing with a more organised compiler with TLS support that is not crippled will put some pressure on them.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: