I honestly have no clue what you're talking about at this point. I feel like you are flooding the zone with noise. It's very simple from my perspective: the actions of private entities don't implicate the first amendment. That doesn't mean they can't be inappropriate in other ways. Just not in that particular way.
> actions of private entities don't implicate the first amendment.
It's worth reviewing calls for censorship coming from private citizens who later assume positions of influence within government: calls that come after taking office may or may not be punishable. Therefore, any influence exerted during campaigns is interesting to follow. It may or may not be a warning signal for how they operate while in office.
