Do you have citations for either of those claims?

Twitter definitely removed pornography which wasn’t labeled or which was posted without the consent of the people involved.

As for CSAM, whoever told you that is blatantly lying to you. There are annual reports showing thousands of reports to NCMEC and accounts getting banned - here’s last year:

https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/202...

Uh yeah sorry but nude photos posted without the subject’s consent is definitely and clearly against Twitter TOS. And the law!

If someone posts revenge porn then Twitter won't take it down if asked? That seems like it's opening itself up to a lot of lawsuits.

Would be pretty crazy if they didn't! That's exactly how Gawker got sued out of existence, as I suspect everyone here remembers.

> Infamously, Twitter did not even remove reported CSAM until after Musk purchased the company and fired the director of Trust and Safety

Source on this?

Anecdotally, the reaction of everyone I know working in law enforcement to the Musk purchase and subsequent layoffs was "this is going to make it infinitely more difficult to get CSAM taken down from Twitter".

> Infamously, Twitter did not even remove reported CSAM until after Musk purchased the company and fired the director of Trust and Safety.

Yeah, that’s gonna need a reputable citation.

Twitter doesn't delete leaked pornography?!

revenge porn is illegal in many jurisdictions