This is not an abuse of power. It's literally what the job entails.
This is why companies have leadership, with diversified duties. So the CEO doesn't have to have knowledge.
You can absolutely, and fairly, argue that is the wrong call, that the team acted too swiftly, but it's weird to look at what has been reported so far and say it was "abuse of power".
This is why companies have leadership, with diversified duties. So the CEO doesn't have to have knowledge.
You can absolutely, and fairly, argue that is the wrong call, that the team acted too swiftly, but it's weird to look at what has been reported so far and say it was "abuse of power".