Hey, thanks for the feedback. As I guess you know writing concisely isn't easy. I mainly write about design, for designers. I can't remember having every seen anyone recommend a volunteer-driven FOSS application _for its UI design_ over commercial alternatives. I do hear people complaining about free tools for being annoying to use. As such, I didn't consider it necessary to make the case that volunteer-driven FOSS is badly designed—I wanted to share what reasons I found for _how_ that came to be.
tl:dr; users should not be frustrated with FOSS and developers should not be frustrated with users using proprietary alternatives, because we'd have to live in a completely different alternative universe for that to be different.
My agenda is that I want more non-developers to be involved in FOSS, so that volunteer-driven FOSS projects get more traction.
tl:dr; users should not be frustrated with FOSS and developers should not be frustrated with users using proprietary alternatives, because we'd have to live in a completely different alternative universe for that to be different.
My agenda is that I want more non-developers to be involved in FOSS, so that volunteer-driven FOSS projects get more traction.