> V promised a lot of stuff as ready but has undelivered most of them
This is wrong. V has an online playground, a package manager, hot code reloading and a REPL whereas Zig doesn't even though Zig is twice as old.
> If V was truthful like Zig, it would be able to create a foundation
Raising money doesn't lead to adoption, though. By this logic, C isn't truthful either since it doesn't have a foundation.
> Also a programming language will never be able to substitute another one if it is not able to call its vast number of libraries
How is this relevant? Both Zig and V can call C code and leverage C's ecosystem of libraries.
> V promised a lot of stuff as ready but has undelivered most of them
This is wrong. V has an online playground, a package manager, hot code reloading and a REPL whereas Zig doesn't even though Zig is twice as old.
> If V was truthful like Zig, it would be able to create a foundation
Raising money doesn't lead to adoption, though. By this logic, C isn't truthful either since it doesn't have a foundation.
> Also a programming language will never be able to substitute another one if it is not able to call its vast number of libraries
How is this relevant? Both Zig and V can call C code and leverage C's ecosystem of libraries.