Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Stratolaunch Systems: Paul Allen launches commercial space project (reuters.com)
23 points by ryanwhitney on Dec 13, 2011 | hide | past | favorite | 14 comments


"Allen's rocket will be launched from a massive carrier aircraft powered by six jumbo jet engines, to be constructed by Scaled Composites, a unit of defense contractor Northrop Grumman Corp. The rocket itself will be made by private space company SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal."


Just pointing out that Musk is not necessarily a 'billionaire' in actual net worth.


yet his [successful] endeavours look like of a billionaire


He is a billionaire these days. He owns 1/3 of Tesla, which has a market cap of $3 billion. His ownership stake in SpaceX is also without a doubt worth a nice chunk of change.


The key distinction between this and Virgin Galactic: orbital spaceflight!


That's definitely the most interesting part. A clone of SpaceShipOne, with a rocket done by SpaceX? Is there anything special about this company?


Mojave Aerospace Ventures developed SpaceShipOne. It was co-founded by Paul Allen.

Seems odd this wasn't mentioned in the article.


Very odd, as this is effectively SpaceShipThree.


Not a clone of SpaceShipOne, a new carrier aircraft that is a derivative of White Knight / White Knight 2 and a new rocket that is a close relative of the Falcon 9. The "special" part is that nobody has done that before, and it may prove to be a worthwhile endeavor.


Do you really gain much from a carrier plane if you want to reach orbital velocity? LEO velocity being ~18,000mph, and any realistic carrier plane going much slower than that.


One thing you gain is less friction. Fifty percent of the atmosphere by mass is below 18,000 feet, per wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth#Pressure_an...


You can use a much smaller rocket due to the launch altitude. Notice how ground-launched rockets go straight up for quite a ways.


i did a thesis on air-launched systems.

Can't save that much on the orbital velocities. The main takeaway is the capability to launch on-demand, from different locations. In which case it suddenly becomes a logistical challenge : i.e how do i prep the system to launch X rockets with short turnaround.

Bear in mind that the payload is limited by what the carrier aircraft can hold. Either use an existing plane and retrofit like what Orbital does , or build an entirely new plane.

There's a bunch of heavily funded startups trying to launch small payloads into orbit, which is always interesting to watch.


I'll just link this instead of duplicating a response here: http://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/nbb6u/combine_all_the...

There are some pretty big advantages, but speed isn't a big part of it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: