Corporate communication is corporate property and fully accessible as it pertains to investigations of corporate wrong-doing. You can be certain Twitter's new legal team is looking at everything. The issue is whether the persons in question were communicating in the capacity of working for Twitter. It's very clear that they were, and it wouldn't be at all surprising if the clown show at Twitter did all manner of unethical things in conflicting with Musk.
> Corporate communication is corporate property and fully accessible as it pertains to investigations of corporate wrong-doing.
I guess it depends on your definition of corporate wrong-doing. If Elon just looked for all posts that include his name and he's firing everyone who was critical of him, that might stretch the definition for most people. That could even cross over into creepy big-brother like oversight and might dissuade people from working at Elon led companies (or maybe attracts people who want him searching their private messages for references to him).
Yeah, except Musk himself already did that:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1586885887341645824
I mean it’s his company he can do as he likes, but that was one of the first things he did after the buyout.