Encouraging people to use a different language entirely (Rust, whatever) is much much more likely to succeed than getting them to use some random Go fork.

> Or are you both implying the power of and supporting the massive monopoly that Google already has?

This is not a reasonable assessment.

Golang is massive; why would anyone switch to not-Golang which isn't backed by a large organisation and just has one string comparison optimisation?

And why would anyone trust a forking entity that forked a runtime to make a change that could be packaged as a library, as the comment you're replying to already suggests?