> It's much more difficult to copy cash then copy information.
> The statement that cash is a lot harder to copy than information still stands.
My last two comments do not seem to be 'pivoting' at all.
Nor do they appear to be bringing up 'straw men', a non-substantiated claim isn't credible.
> I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve.
I was trying to achieve a response to your comment that:
'There is no conceptual reason why a distributed cryptographic currency could not take the place of cash for in person transactions. In realty crypto has many other issues, but not this one.'
There is in fact at least one conceptual reason 'why a distributed cryptographic currency could not take the place of cash for in person transactions'.
High resolution color printers are orders of magnitude more difficult to access then similar tools for information.