My government regulating body in charge of preserving interoperability with small /alternative tech and stability in time, at least for critical online services, is not doing its job.
Was even planing to bootstrap my own small/alternative "tech" from some small/alternative noscript/basic (x)html components. Namely without the 489374392843 devs financed by google or apple...
Not to mention, it is a quasi-monopoly: blink is a fork of webkit, and geeko is kept alive by google (probably as a protection against anti-trust regulation). It is even worse from an "owner" point of view: from a "vanguard/blackrock" point of view, this is monopoly. That would concern the general anti-trust regulating body.
There are certainly way more to that, I am discussing with lawyers what to present to the judge.
What is your personal incentive to do this beyond the ideological viewpoint of not being beholden to big tech?
For the record I’m in agreement with your stance, I’m just curious about this.