So you're saying that you think that they are lying, and falsifying weather information? Do you think they came up with this plan 300 years ago when they started recording?
This is a report about a thing that is happening. You can see it as a sign of something else, you can see it as not necessarily a sign of something else. To refuse to see it at all, however, is concerning.
I am glad you are concerned about me. You come across as a very sensitive person, suggesting (for some reason that is unclear to me, but presumably clear to a very intuitive person like yourself) that I believe there is a 300-yr old conspiracy theory to falsify weather "information"? I don't think I actually mentioned anything about the article, I mentioned no views about climate change at all, no-one asked.
All I pointed out was that the guy saying Scotland was suddenly "snow-free" had obviously not been to Scotland. Because it doesn't actually snow here very often, people just think it does. Take a deep breath. Not everything is an anti-climate change conspiracy.
So you're saying that you think that they are lying, and falsifying weather information? Do you think they came up with this plan 300 years ago when they started recording?
This is a report about a thing that is happening. You can see it as a sign of something else, you can see it as not necessarily a sign of something else. To refuse to see it at all, however, is concerning.