The problem is simple and not at all what you are implying. When you say that the cause of X is global warming/climate change without a qualifier, you are making an unverified statement which is likely true. Likely true is not definitely true and thus presenting it as definitely true is a lie. This causes distrust and is one of the reasons people are losing trust in the media.
In Canada for example, we are constantly told by our state funded media that hurricane Fiona was climate change. When the weather is atypical it is climate change. Absolutely zero care is given to the people who understand that atypical weather happens nearly every year if not every year. This is causing distrust.
We also have our PM. A man elected by name and haircut. He has done some good, but he has also publicly praised China's system of governance as being admirable[1].
Between these three points, people have reasons to be a sceptic. Climate change is also not the only topic like this in Canada and this problem isn't only in Canada.
I agree. It isn't reasonable to point to climate change as the cause of any single event. Once records start getting broken on a regular basis however, it is necessary to accept that as evidence.
In Canada for example, we are constantly told by our state funded media that hurricane Fiona was climate change. When the weather is atypical it is climate change. Absolutely zero care is given to the people who understand that atypical weather happens nearly every year if not every year. This is causing distrust.
We also have our PM. A man elected by name and haircut. He has done some good, but he has also publicly praised China's system of governance as being admirable[1].
Between these three points, people have reasons to be a sceptic. Climate change is also not the only topic like this in Canada and this problem isn't only in Canada.
[1]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/justin-trudeau-s-fool...