Honestly I don't think its very good at emulating style. It picks up some things but often times misses the heart of the matter.
Did some spot checking with some of my favorite artists. Rockwell's paintings are all about storytelling, clearly not present in the work. Their emulation for frazetta doesn't look like frazetta's work at all. HR Giger emulation is a joke. David finch at least gets a penciler's style but misses the use of solid blacks and dynamic posing. Frank Miller doesn't look like miller's work at all. etc etc etc
This list goes on and on. Personally while I understand using the 'in the style of' as a way to change the image results, I think in many many cases the results just don't look like the art of that artist.
Did some spot checking with some of my favorite artists. Rockwell's paintings are all about storytelling, clearly not present in the work. Their emulation for frazetta doesn't look like frazetta's work at all. HR Giger emulation is a joke. David finch at least gets a penciler's style but misses the use of solid blacks and dynamic posing. Frank Miller doesn't look like miller's work at all. etc etc etc
This list goes on and on. Personally while I understand using the 'in the style of' as a way to change the image results, I think in many many cases the results just don't look like the art of that artist.