Government-owned hospitals are a bad idea in my view, because there's no incentive to provide good customer (patient) service, innovate, or move elective procedures to specialized surgical centres outside of a hospital centre. Nor any incentives to provide convenient non-hospital urgent care clinics like you see all over America.
The best hospital systems in the world, like Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic, are generally non-profits operating in a mixed system where they take private insurance, out-of-pocket payments, and medicare/medicaid. They have to remain competitive otherwise they won't attract customers from out-of-state or out-of-country. If you basically force patients on the public system to only use certain government-run hospitals, you're dooming them to an inferior experience than what you could get by perhaps enhancing access to public pay for some services.
> Government-owned hospitals are a bad idea in my view, because there's no incentive to provide good customer (patient) service, innovate, or move elective procedures to specialized surgical centres outside of a hospital centre.
1) The incentive to innovate in the overall medical field is fulfilled by the existence of private hospitals, which according to my OC wouldn't be banned or cease to exist. They would coexist alongside the public ones.
2) Behind your statement lies the necessary asumption that the medical staff would not provide a good service to their patients because the government would pay them less than private hospitals. While it is a spectrum, most decent doctors won't treat their patients worse because they are getting paid less, something that is not the patient's fault nor responsibility.
Besides, one does not choose to get ill or suddenly feel in need of medical care.
Your use of the word "customer" to refer to a medical patient sickens me.
Ask the leadership team at the Cleveland Clinic if they see patients as customers, and they'd say yes, absolutely.
This is one of the top hospital systems in the world, and they serve patients from all socioeconomic backgrounds. You may want to think about what information they have that you don't when it comes to delivering world-class healthcare.
The best hospital systems in the world, like Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic, are generally non-profits operating in a mixed system where they take private insurance, out-of-pocket payments, and medicare/medicaid. They have to remain competitive otherwise they won't attract customers from out-of-state or out-of-country. If you basically force patients on the public system to only use certain government-run hospitals, you're dooming them to an inferior experience than what you could get by perhaps enhancing access to public pay for some services.