I think you have it backwards. That's why you'd want a Lisp-2 over a Lisp-1. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Zambyte on Sept 15, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Racket? Why Lisp? (2014) I think you have it backwards. That's why you'd want a Lisp-2 over a Lisp-1.

Kamq on Sept 16, 2022 [–]

That's what I was describing, yes.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact